« It's the little things ... | Main | So bizarre it's fascinating »

What I really meant to say was ....

In a comment to a previous post Jon Husband asks for clarification.

I thought others may want to read it.

Much of corporate IT has been designed to replicate a heirarchical view of organisations which pidgeon holes people and bears little relation to the real world they work in.

Also most people are still pretty uninspired by computers and fail to make them work for them. They have given up a lot of their social interchanges in return for staring at computer screens and neatly lined up behind the view of them as meatware in a system.

If on the other hand they had been encouraged to grow up, take responsibility, and form relationships then the power to get things done would increase dramaticaly - as the ability to get things done relies heavily on relationship and communication - two things which conventional computing seems designed to limit.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c00e153ef00d834e5df4d69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What I really meant to say was ....:

Comments

When we were all very busy doing KM a few years ago we found out that we were faced with KM Systems whose nature was socio-technical. Unfortunately most of us invested heavily into the technical part, instead of the socio part. That was a mistake I still notice being repeated again and again, with every new and cool application coming up. Maybe the problem is based in the fact that the human emotional repertoire doesn't seem to have evolved much (if at all, read Shakespeare or the Old Testament)over time, whereas we invent a new tool every other day.

Very true that the hard stuff isn't the technology but each iteration does seem to make small strides towards being more closely aligned to the social world it operates in. Whether or not the reality lives up to the hype the aspirations of Web 2.0 as defined in his original article by Tim O'Reilly is a long way from the design criteria of mainframes 40 years ago.

It also depends on the ownership of the software and the intentions of those who have control of it. Again the approach I took at the BBC of aiming for a distributed feeling of ownership and excitement at the unpredictability that engendered is probably some people's worst nightmare!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

This blog is mothballed

  • My new blog can be found here