« No logo | Main | My local celebrates St. George's Day »

A word or two on conferences

I have to say that I am really looking forward to the Blogs and Social Media Forum that I am chairing in May.

When the idea was first suggested to me I was really unsure about saying yes. I have become very wary of being taken advantage of by commercial conference organisers over the years and was doubly wary of being associated with yet another money spinning, band waggon joining, pointless exercise.

However an hour long phone call with Lorna, the conference organiser, left me feeling that they really had listened to the punters and potential contributors when we said that we wanted more time to network and less time being talked at. I also believe that they have got together a pretty interesting bunch of people - and I for one am really looking forward to meeting JP Rangaswami whose blog is becoming a must read for me these days.

I was also very aware of the unconferencing meme going around at the moment but to be honest I am getting pretty tired of a small group of people who have attended mind-bloggling numbers of conferences, along with pretty much the same group of geeks, over the past four years in the US getting bored with themselves and declaring conferences dead. I know from experience that there are still a lot of people for whom "real" conferences continue to have value - especially for people who are new to a subject and not one of the chosen few.

And anyway - people like Chris Corrigan, Jon Husband and Johnnie Moore have been applying open space principles to group working for years very effectively. Getting a bunch of people to self-organise round things they feel passionate about wasn't invented by Dave Winer.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/37987/4711110

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A word or two on conferences:

» Is there a perfect kind of conference? from mathewingram.com/work
Since Im involved in organizing one in May, my eye always gets caught by any mention of what makes a good conference versus a bad one, which is how I wound up reading Euan Semples post on his blog The Obvious, about a forum on blogs and ... [Read More]

» The Perfect Conference from Mark Evans
There's a bit of a chatter today in the blogosphere on the conference vs. the unconference. Mathew Ingram has an intriguing post on whether there is a p... [Read More]

» Conference perfection from Stuart MacDonald
Well, maybe not. But certainly worth aiming for, no? At least that's the hope we have for [Read More]

Comments

"Getting a bunch of people to self-organise round things they feel passionate about wasn't invented by Dave Winer."

True, and that isn't what BloggerCon is/was about.

http://www.bloggercon.org/iii/newbies

The term "unconference" has been twisted to mean something very different from BC. Not my doing, btw.

Have a happy, if that's possible. :-)

Whatever you want to call it, with you in the chair, I will be there.... See you there !

Most conference organisers cannot think outside of the time-worn Powerpoint-centred pulpit focus. Fair play to you if the social side of the event is given more time than a toilet break. I've started attending conferences because of who will be in the foyer, not because of who is speaking. You learn more from conversations, not from being spoken to.

Post a comment

Business Site


  • Button

Current Listening


Search


Blogroll

LibraryThing


Online Life

Photos


Subscribe by e-mail

Tracking